but that it changed quickly suggests that after he put her profile online KC was simply informed by someone that in English "worm" these days typically gets used for actual animals rather than earth dragons.
Worm is still a valid way of referring to that particular kind of serpents, as valid as either Wyrm or Wurm as a matter of fact. So the change was merely cosmetic and there was not a solid reason behind to make it... Unlike this case, where the naming choice clearly clashes with what the author was supposedly trying to say with this entry.
But like I said... Hey suit yourselves...
.P.S.: As for the rest...
Its a discussion forum, one doesn't have to be asking a question for another user to comment on what is said (at least as long as it is relevant to the discussion).
I should definitely say something about this one... As you pretty much trampled what I said in order to answer a question... for no reason... But truth to be told... there would be no point in going any further, so thanks for giving me "relevance" I guess.
And last but not least... Even if they don't have the ability to mass produce Wights (which then again, I'm inclined to believe they can... until the author states otherwise), the ability to produce them is still something to be feared and something to place them right into the Mary Sue tier as:
1) Wights are supposed to be exceptionally rare (as they're born from extremely exceptional individuals like royalty, nobility, heroines and the like).
2) Even if they can "evolve" from Zombies, it would take an abnormally long while to trigger that change... decades... if lucky.
So if there is a monster out there that can produce Wights even if it's just a rare and sporadical phenomenon, it's definitely something that doesn't change my reaction (the one you've been trying to rectify for quite a few posts) and it still make claims both valid and reasonable... regardless of what you think and what you feel about them.
